SELF-REALIZATION as LIFE as EQUALITY & ONENESS
Spitefulness: FREEDOM of SPEECH?
the concept of ´freedom of speech´ is ´quite a hill to climb´ and can indeed be described as climbing a hill - whereby within this race it´s all about who will climb ´higher´, ´faster´, ´better´ -who will be more ´important´, who will have most followers and will be admired/worshipped most, who will have the highest ´self esteem´ in the eyes of other -in other words: who will manage best to promote self and give the best ´logic´ that justifies self as what self thinks and how self lives.
then we will say we have ´freedom of speech´ -which is as ironic as it is to speak of ´human rights´.
freedom of speech implies: i have the right to say ´no´ - it is ´my right´ - implied: ´above and apart everything and everyone else´.
this is how common sense solutions that have been presented in consideration of all equally - have always been dumped down: because someone always made use of ´their´ ´freedom of speech´ and said ´no´ - in fact saying ´yes´ to one´s own interest only, in spite of what is best for all; saying yes only to one´s own way in separation from all as one as equal: ´i will have it my way´, ´my opinion is the best´, ´i will stand up for my rights´, ´i have freedom of speech´.
just like with human rights!
what would be the necessity for ´human rights´ if all men were equal as Life as one?
what would be the need or necessity for something like ´freedom of speech´ if all were equal as one Life?
thus, manifestations such as ´human rights´ and ´freedom of speech´ are signing the acceptance and allowance of the opposite and within the make-up of ´values´ such as ´resistance´, ´opposition´, ´revolution´, ´standing-up´ -are used deliberately for self-interest and deception.
this acceptance and allowance gives permission for separation/polarity to exist, whereby some have (rights/freedom etc.) and some don´t -because those that have are apparently ´more important´, ´more clever´, in some way ´more´/´better´/´higher´ - while those that don´t have are ´anyway worth less´ and ´probably deserve´ to be ignored, abused, manipulated;
such ´logic´/reasons/justifications can of course only be spoken by those that have ´freedom of speech´ -because obviously there exist those that have in fact no means/way/possibility to speak for all of us to hear, let alone the freedom to do so.
those that could use ´freedom of speech´ to speak out for all as one as equal are not given the opportunity to do so, but are repressed instead (for example children or the animals, if one would dare to hear) - and those that claim it for themselves (ab)use it in and for as deception, within this standing equal to deception as it.
i could go as far as to say that in fact, in our accepted and allowed reality as this world, no-one has ´freedom of speech´. because we live in separation, and every ´speech´/opinion is a reaction to another ´speech´/opinion, thus everything actually only existing as separate parts, each but of one perspective -thus: do we actually really speak? do we really communicate? does ´speech´ exist? and how is ´speech´ actually defined?
within the concept of/as ´freedom of speech´, ´speech´ is defined as the I AM of the personality -in greek: ATOMO.
imagine what it would be like if every atom in your body would claim their own ´freedom of speech´ in spite of all the other atoms that have in fact exist within equilibrium as one body -as an example.
in university, we have our professors giving ´speeches´ to share their profound knowledge with their less profound students.
freedom of speech...
´freedom´ within this seems to be defined as ´the right´ to insist on MY opinion, MY way, MY ´freedom of speech´ in SPITE of it all, in SPITE of what is best for all, in SPITE of Common Sense, in SPITE of what is actually Here and obvious for all to see.
thus in fact the words ´freedom of speech´ are empty words that have become equal to deception, whereby only the ´I AM´ is considered -but not the I as Self as Life as All I´s / Self´s Equally.
no-one is free until all is free: this is the revelation of the Deception as ´freedom of speech´ - the revelation of ´freedom of speech´ as Spitefulness.
p.s.
needless to say that if one participate in the ´human race´ as a competition of/as ´reaching higher´/´climbing a hill´, using the excuse/justification: ´freedom of speech´ - to perceive or impose self as ´the one´/the ´winner´ = one inevitably creates the opposite polarity and down the hill one goes (in the best case ending up ´only´ with the shock of a life time, a broken nose and a waisted racer).
then we will say we have ´freedom of speech´ -which is as ironic as it is to speak of ´human rights´.
freedom of speech implies: i have the right to say ´no´ - it is ´my right´ - implied: ´above and apart everything and everyone else´.
this is how common sense solutions that have been presented in consideration of all equally - have always been dumped down: because someone always made use of ´their´ ´freedom of speech´ and said ´no´ - in fact saying ´yes´ to one´s own interest only, in spite of what is best for all; saying yes only to one´s own way in separation from all as one as equal: ´i will have it my way´, ´my opinion is the best´, ´i will stand up for my rights´, ´i have freedom of speech´.
just like with human rights!
what would be the necessity for ´human rights´ if all men were equal as Life as one?
what would be the need or necessity for something like ´freedom of speech´ if all were equal as one Life?
thus, manifestations such as ´human rights´ and ´freedom of speech´ are signing the acceptance and allowance of the opposite and within the make-up of ´values´ such as ´resistance´, ´opposition´, ´revolution´, ´standing-up´ -are used deliberately for self-interest and deception.
this acceptance and allowance gives permission for separation/polarity to exist, whereby some have (rights/freedom etc.) and some don´t -because those that have are apparently ´more important´, ´more clever´, in some way ´more´/´better´/´higher´ - while those that don´t have are ´anyway worth less´ and ´probably deserve´ to be ignored, abused, manipulated;
such ´logic´/reasons/justifications can of course only be spoken by those that have ´freedom of speech´ -because obviously there exist those that have in fact no means/way/possibility to speak for all of us to hear, let alone the freedom to do so.
those that could use ´freedom of speech´ to speak out for all as one as equal are not given the opportunity to do so, but are repressed instead (for example children or the animals, if one would dare to hear) - and those that claim it for themselves (ab)use it in and for as deception, within this standing equal to deception as it.
i could go as far as to say that in fact, in our accepted and allowed reality as this world, no-one has ´freedom of speech´. because we live in separation, and every ´speech´/opinion is a reaction to another ´speech´/opinion, thus everything actually only existing as separate parts, each but of one perspective -thus: do we actually really speak? do we really communicate? does ´speech´ exist? and how is ´speech´ actually defined?
within the concept of/as ´freedom of speech´, ´speech´ is defined as the I AM of the personality -in greek: ATOMO.
imagine what it would be like if every atom in your body would claim their own ´freedom of speech´ in spite of all the other atoms that have in fact exist within equilibrium as one body -as an example.
in university, we have our professors giving ´speeches´ to share their profound knowledge with their less profound students.
freedom of speech...
´freedom´ within this seems to be defined as ´the right´ to insist on MY opinion, MY way, MY ´freedom of speech´ in SPITE of it all, in SPITE of what is best for all, in SPITE of Common Sense, in SPITE of what is actually Here and obvious for all to see.
thus in fact the words ´freedom of speech´ are empty words that have become equal to deception, whereby only the ´I AM´ is considered -but not the I as Self as Life as All I´s / Self´s Equally.
no-one is free until all is free: this is the revelation of the Deception as ´freedom of speech´ - the revelation of ´freedom of speech´ as Spitefulness.
p.s.
needless to say that if one participate in the ´human race´ as a competition of/as ´reaching higher´/´climbing a hill´, using the excuse/justification: ´freedom of speech´ - to perceive or impose self as ´the one´/the ´winner´ = one inevitably creates the opposite polarity and down the hill one goes (in the best case ending up ´only´ with the shock of a life time, a broken nose and a waisted racer).
Add a Comment
About
© 2009 Created by Bella B. on Ning. Create Your Own Social Network
You need to be a member of PROCESS LIFE to add comments!
Join this social network